Choosing between vehicle & armor model kits comes down to the kind of project you actually want: a vintage mixed lot with aircraft and military vehicles, or one focused tank build with a defined parts count. The Magister Hobby Miniatures lot and Revell M48A2 Patton take very different approaches, so the lower-priced option is not simply a smaller version of the other.
Quick verdict
Choose the 1967 Hobby Miniatures Magister Plane-Tank Lot if the appeal is a vintage novelty-model collection with multiple small kits and mixed subjects. Choose the Revell M48A2 Patton Tank Model Kit if you want one identifiable armor subject, a 152-piece assembly, and features such as movable hatches, turret cannon, machine gun, and treads.
Price and format comparison
| Comparison | Magister Hobby Miniatures lot | Revell M48A2 Patton tank kit |
|---|---|---|
| Listed price | $245.00 | $21.88 |
| Format | Vintage lot with plane and tank kits | One plastic M48A2 Patton tank model |
| Build setup | Five factory-sealed kits plus one opened example | One model requiring assembly |
| Notable contents | Tiny plastic parts and small-scale models | 152 pieces, crew, six military figures, decals |
The listed price gap is $223.12, which reflects a difference in format as much as a difference in kit subject. Magister is a multi-item vintage lot; Revell is a single tank project.
Where each product wins
- Magister wins for vintage-lot appeal: The 1960s Hobby Miniatures theme, original boxes, and combination of aircraft and military vehicles make it the more distinctive choice for someone seeking a period collection rather than one armor subject.
- Revell wins for a focused tank build: The M48A2 Patton title, 1:35 scale, waterslide decals, illustrated instructions, and movable components give the project a clearly defined direction.
- Revell wins when the listed price gap matters: Its $21.88 price is easier to match to a single-kit project, while Magister's $245 price is tied to a larger vintage lot.
Product notes
1967 Hobby Miniatures Magister Plane-Tank Lot
Choose the Magister lot if the attraction is a 1960s novelty-model collection rather than one focused armor subject. The description identifies five factory-sealed kits in their original boxes and protective wrapping, plus an opened example with its parts bagged inside. The boxes show aircraft and military vehicles, creating a mixed theme that is distinct from the Revell tank. The limitation is the lot format: it combines plane and tank subjects, and the small-scale models use tiny plastic parts, so it is not the straightforward pick for someone specifically seeking a single, larger-scale tank project. At $245, it also requires wanting the vintage collection itself, not just a basic build.
Revell M48A2 Patton Tank Model Kit
Revell is the more direct choice when the goal is one recognizable armor subject: an M48A2 Patton tank in 1:35 with 152 pieces. Opening and closing hatches, a movable turret cannon, machine gun, and tank treads provide several physical details to assemble. Two crew members, six military figures, waterslide decals, and illustrated instructions further define the project. Its limitation is that this is an assembly kit, not a ready-built model. The description calls for a hobby knife, plastic cement, sprue cutters, and paint, so the build involves additional hobby supplies. Its single-tank format also lacks the mixed aircraft-and-vehicle character of the Magister lot.
Final choice by use case
- For a vintage mixed collection: Pick the Magister Hobby Miniatures lot, with its aircraft-and-military-vehicle theme and five sealed kits plus one opened example.
- For one dedicated tank project: Pick the Revell M48A2 Patton, whose 1:35 subject, 152 pieces, figures, decals, and movable components all center on one build.
- For the $223.12 price gap: Revell is the practical direction if the purchase is meant to be a single vehicle project rather than a vintage lot.
In short, Magister is the choice for the character of a multi-kit vintage lot; Revell is the choice for a focused plastic tank build.
